Fox News: Harrison Ford says he doesn’t ‘know of a greater criminal in history’ than Trump
“Indiana Jones” star Harrison Ford told The Guardian on Friday that he doesn’t “know of a greater criminal in history” than President Donald Trump, criticizing him for failing to address climate change.
Ford said to The Guardian that Trump “doesn’t have any policies, he has whims. It scares the s— out of me. The ignorance, the hubris, the lies, the perfidy. [Trump] knows better, but he’s an instrument of the status quo, and he’s making money, hand over fist, while the world goes to hell in a handbasket.”
“It’s unbelievable,” he added. “I don’t know of a greater criminal in history.”
Hollywood icon Harrison Ford recently declared that he “doesn’t know of a greater criminal in history” than former President Donald Trump, attacking Trump primarily for his climate policies or perceived lack thereof. While Ford’s moral posturing reflects frustration over climate change and politics, his comments reveal a profound disconnect from reality and a shocking lapse in historical perspective.
Distorting History and Reality
To dub Donald Trump—an ex-President of the United States, elected through democratic processes—as the “greatest criminal in history” is not only hyperbolic but absurd. History’s darkest criminals have orchestrated genocides, authoritarian regimes, and systemic atrocities, causing millions of deaths and untold suffering worldwide. Comparing anyone—even a controversial political figure—to figures like Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot, or Mao diminishes the horrific magnitude of those crimes and distorts public understanding.
Ford’s reckless labeling cheapens the meaning of criminality itself. Trump’s controversial policies on climate and other issues are indeed debatable. Still, accusations of criminal behavior should be substantiated by legal evidence and due process, not celebrity opinion or political disagreement.
Simplistic, Emotion-Driven Criticism
Ford’s indictment of Trump hinges largely on emotional assertions: “ignorance,” “deceit,” and “betrayal.” It is easy for a Hollywood star to sling grand moral condemnations when detached from the complex realities of governance. Ford accuses Trump of lacking “policies” and acting on “whims,” yet Trump’s administration pursued a consistent agenda that aligned with his campaign promises and the preferences of millions of voters, including policies such as deregulation and energy independence.
Moreover, Trump’s climate skepticism is contested but reflects one side of a highly polarized debate, not clear criminality. Scientific discussions and policy disputes about climate approaches should be settled using facts and policy analysis, not celebrity caricatures.
Hypocrisy and Elite Detachment
There’s also an element of elite detachment in Ford’s outrage. The actor’s own lifestyle, including ownership of multiple properties and private jets, highlights the contradictions when celebrities chastise politicians for environmental policies. The performative moralizing from someone living a high-carbon footprint lifestyle risks alienating audiences and trivializing the challenges at hand.
Conclusion: Rejecting Celebrity Grandstanding
Harrison Ford’s dramatic condemnation offers little substance beyond partisan grandstanding and hyperbole. The “greatest criminal in history” label lacks factual backing and historical perspective; it reduces a divisive political debate to personal insults rather than constructive dialogue. Citizens deserve sober, evidence-based discussions about policies and politics—not celebrity outrages divorced from reality and overstated rhetoric.