Skip to content

The Righteous Cause

Whoever said the pen is mightier than the sword obviously never encountered Rambo’s fully automatic M60 belt fed Machine Gun.

Menu
  • Recent Posts
Menu

Debunking Everytown’s Dubious Claim: No Evidence for “1 in 15 Adults” Experiencing Mass Shootings

Posted on April 21, 2025 by Dennis Robbins

Everytown Research & Policy, a prominent gun control advocacy group, recently posted a graphic on X claiming that “1 in 15 adults in the U.S. have experienced a mass shooting.” This staggering statistic, implying over 17 million American adults have faced such trauma, demands scrutiny, especially given its potential to shape public perception and policy. Yet, a deep dive into Everytown’s own report, “Mass Shootings in the United States” (https://everytownresearch.org/mass-shootings-in-america/), reveals a glaring issue: nowhere does the report substantiate or even address this bold claim. This investigative post critically examines the discrepancy, exposing Everytown’s misleading narrative and questioning the integrity of their research methods.

The Claim: A Statistic Without a Source
Everytown’s X graphic asserts that 1 in 15 U.S. adults—roughly 6.67% of the adult population (approximately 258 million in 2025)—have “experienced” a mass shooting. This suggests direct exposure, such as being a victim, survivor, or witness, to an event Everytown defines as an incident where “four or more people are shot and killed, excluding the shooter.” With about 17.2 million adults implied, the claim is extraordinary, yet Everytown’s report, cited as the source, offers no data, methodology, or discussion to back it up. The report, last updated in March 2023, focuses on mass shooting trends, gun law correlations, and policy solutions, but contains no survey, statistical analysis, or reference to adult exposure rates.

The absence is striking. Everytown’s methodology details 194 mass shootings from 2009–2018, averaging 19 per year, with a high of 24 in 2011 and 2013. Even expanding to 4,011 mass shootings from 2014–2022 (per a 2023 JAMA study cited in Wikipedia), the cumulative victim count—killed or wounded—remains in the thousands, not millions. Assuming an average of 10 victims per incident (a generous estimate), 4,011 shootings yield roughly 40,110 victims, far short of 17 million. Everytown’s report also notes that “the reach of mass shootings stretches far beyond those killed and wounded,” impacting communities, but it provides no quantitative evidence for such a broad exposure claim.

Critical Examination: Where’s the Data?
Everytown’s failure to substantiate the “1 in 15” claim raises red flags. The report’s data focuses on incident counts, gun types (e.g., 81% of mass shootings involve handguns), and correlations with state gun laws, not population exposure. No section addresses surveys, interviews, or statistical models estimating how many adults have “experienced” mass shootings. A related Everytown post on X (@gen0m1cs, March 31, 2025) critiques a similar claim, noting a “crazy broad definition” that might include “neighborhood shootouts” or vague “public” incidents, suggesting methodological overreach. Yet, even this critique finds no trace of the 1 in 15 figure in Everytown’s work.

The claim’s plausibility falters under scrutiny. The U.S. adult population in 2025 is roughly 258 million. Dividing 17.2 million by 4,011 incidents (2014–2022) implies each mass shooting affected over 4,200 adults—an absurd figure given most incidents occur in localized settings (e.g., schools, malls). Everytown’s own data shows mass shootings are rare relative to overall gun violence (125 daily gun deaths, 200 wounded), making the 1 in 15 claim statistically implausible without a radically expanded definition of “experience” (e.g., hearing news reports), which the report never articulates.

Everytown’s Track Record: Advocacy Over Accuracy?
Everytown’s advocacy-driven mission—promoting gun control through “evidence-based policies”—may explain the discrepancy. The report emphasizes solutions like background checks and Extreme Risk laws, using emotive language (“mass shootings haunt our nation’s collective conscience”) to galvanize support. The “1 in 15” graphic, lacking substantiation, appears as a rhetorical tool to amplify fear and urgency, rather than a rigorously derived statistic. Critics on X, like @wil_da_beast630 (May 26, 2022), have called Everytown’s numbers “complete hack-work,” accusing them of inflating school shooting counts by including minor incidents. This pattern suggests a willingness to prioritize impact over precision, undermining credibility.

The report’s silence on the claim is damning. If Everytown conducted a survey or analysis to support “1 in 15,” it should be detailed in the methodology, yet no such evidence exists. Alternative sources, like a 2024 Everytown brief on LGBTQ+ youth, note that 22% of transgender youth reported being impacted by a mass shooting, but this is a specific demographic, not the general adult population, and still falls short of explaining the broader claim. The JAMA study (2023) and The Violence Project database (1966–2019) confirm mass shootings’ devastating but localized impact, with no data suggesting millions of adults are directly affected.

Implications: Misleading the Public
Everytown’s unsubstantiated claim risks eroding trust in gun violence research. They fuel skepticism by broadcasting a statistic without evidence, as seen in X posts questioning their methodology. The “1 in 15” figure, if exaggerated, distorts the public’s understanding of mass shootings, potentially overshadowing real victims’ experiences and undermining legitimate policy discussions. Traditional Christian doctrine, which values truth (John 8:32), would caution against such misleading assertions, urging accountability over agenda-driven narratives.

The establishment narrative—Everytown as a reliable research authority—warrants scrutiny. Their failure to align the X graphic with their report suggests either sloppy scholarship or deliberate sensationalism, neither of which serves the public good. The absence of transparency about data sources or definitions (e.g., what constitutes “experience”) further erodes confidence, especially when juxtaposed with their detailed analyses of other metrics.

Conclusion
Everytown Research’s claim that “1 in 15 adults in the U.S. have experienced a mass shooting” is a bold assertion unsupported by their own report. The *Mass Shootings in the United States* document offers no data, survey, or analysis to confirm this statistic, revealing a troubling gap between advocacy and evidence. This discrepancy, coupled with Everytown’s history of contested claims, suggests a prioritization of emotional impact over factual rigor. As gun violence demands serious solutions, such misleading graphics only muddy the waters, betraying the trust of those seeking truth in a crisis. Follow the data, not the hype—Everytown’s claim doesn’t hold up.

**Sources**: Everytown for Gun Safety Support Fund, “Mass Shootings in the United States,” March 2023, https://everytownresearch.org/mass-shooting-report/; Wikipedia, “Mass Shootings in the United States,” April 15, 2025; posts on X[](https://www.everytown.org/issues/mass-shootings/)[](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_shootings_in_the_United_States)

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Posts

News & Commentary

Somewhere in the world, there is a defeat for everyone. Some are destroyed by defeat, and some made small and mean by victory. Greatness lives in one who triumphs equally over defeat and victory.

~John Steinbeck

Email: dennis@novus2.com

Recent Posts

  • Is refurbishing Alcatraz a good idea? Grok says no.
    Refurbishing Alcatraz Federal Penitentiary to resume operations as a functioning prison capable of receiving inmates is a complex endeavor, given its historical status, deteriorating infrastructure, isolated island location, and modern regulatory requirements. Below, I […]
  • Rethinking Creative Collaboration: A Response to “Did AI Writing Count as Your Writing?”
    From Deseret.com: Perspective: If you depend on AI to write something, then have you actually written it? Honest question: if you need AI to generate ideas for stories, to rewrite your sentences and paragraphs, or restructure your book, or even produce any portion of a […]
  • Brazen Bill Brazelton: The Masked Highwayman of the Southwest
    The sun beat down mercilessly on the Arizona Territory in the summer of 1878, casting long shadows across the dusty trails that connected the scattered settlements of the Southwest. For travelers along these routes, the journey was arduous enough without the added fear of […]
  • The Growing Concerns and Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Human Behavior
    Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly conversational models like ChatGPT, has transformed how we interact with technology, offering unprecedented access to information and personalized responses. However, as AI integrates deeper into daily life, it is beginning to […]
  • Protected: Zero Hour Protocol
    There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.
  • How to Navigate the Firehose of News Headlines: A Guide to Filtering Information Overload
    In an era where news headlines stream incessantly across our screens—on social media, news apps, and websites—the sheer volume of information can feel like drinking from a firehose. Every hour, we’re bombarded with breaking news, opinion pieces, and viral stories, each […]
  • Environmental Concerns and Impact of Recent Developments in Artificial Intelligence Introduction
    Artificial Intelligence (AI) has ushered in transformative advancements across industries, from healthcare to transportation, with recent developments like ChatGPT’s enhanced search capabilities and generative AI models pushing the boundaries of innovation. However, these […]
  • The Atlantic notes: “Something Alarming Is Happening to the Job Market”
    The Atlantic: A new sign that AI is competing with college grads Something strange, and potentially alarming, is happening to the job market for young, educated workers. According to the New York Federal Reserve, labor conditions for recent college graduates have […]
  • Pastor Joey Sampaga’s sermon notes: “Faithful Eyes: Recognizing the Messiah,” based on Luke 2:21-38.
    East Valley International Church is where faith meets innovation! With xAI’s Grok jotting down notes, Pastor Joey Sampaga’s sermon on “Recognizing the Messiah” (Luke 2:21-38) comes alive. His heartfelt teaching ties Scripture to our daily lives, inspiring our lively […]
  • E.V.I.C. Sunday School Notes: What is Salvation?
    East Valley International Church merges faith with technology, using xAI’s Grok to capture Sunday School insights. Pastor Joey Sampaga’s exploration of “What is Salvation,” delving into biblical teachings, theological depth, and its relevance for today’s believers, brings […]
  • Unlocking Phoenix’s Job Market: The Ultimate List
    Your Ultimate Guide to Direct Career Pages for Top Corporations, Medical Facilities, Tech Startups, and More in the Valley of the Sun Welcome to the definitive resource for job seekers in the Phoenix, Arizona, metropolitan area—spanning Phoenix, Mesa, Tempe, Glendale, […]
  • Is Scientology a True Religion for the Twenty-First Century or Just Another Space Opera Cult?
    THE MOVIE: Battlefield Earth To put it bluntly, Battlefield Earth stands out as a colossal failure in the sci-fi genre, “much like the Hindenburg disaster did for Zeppelin air travel.” While not explicitly a Scientology film, Battlefield Earth, based on L. Ron […]
  • Zero Hour Protocol — End Notes
    Zero Hour Protocol — End Notes Dear Reader, You’ve just experienced “Zero Hour Protocol,” a collaborative work between human creativity and artificial intelligence. As the author behind this project, I wanted to share a glimpse into the unique […]
  • Nailed to the Cross: A Biblical and Historical Investigation into Jesus’s Crucifixion
    A recent article from *Christianity Today* (https://www.christianitytoday.com/2025/04/was-jesus-crucified-with-nails/) raises the provocative claim that Jesus was crucified using ropes rather than nails, challenging centuries of Christian tradition and biblical testimony. […]
  • Angel or Architect of Error? Investigating Felix Y. Manalo’s Role in Iglesia Ni Cristo.
    PROMPT for Grok: Write an investigative research post that digs into as much available content about Mr. Manalo, his personal history, religious affiliations, early information on the church’s founding, controversies, public condemnations, and his passing in 1963. […]
©2025 The Righteous Cause | Built using WordPress and Responsive Blogily theme by Superb